Re: members update
I am afraid I hold a different view. It is clear to me that the Chairman has acted outside of the published constitution in taking what is described as autocratic action.
The absence of comment by the remaining committee members to me indicates their tacit approval of the Chairmans actions. Brian in particular has been subject to criticm, justified or not. As such they are all disregarding the unanimous support that Sue and Bob have recieved from the general membership.
Given these circumstances, in my opinion, none of the remaining committee are vocally acting in the long term interest of the MOC, and I am wondering what they have to hide. As a body they are rapidy losing credibility as individuals that we must trust to take the club forwards.
I am afraid I hold a different view. It is clear to me that the Chairman has acted outside of the published constitution in taking what is described as autocratic action.
The absence of comment by the remaining committee members to me indicates their tacit approval of the Chairmans actions. Brian in particular has been subject to criticm, justified or not. As such they are all disregarding the unanimous support that Sue and Bob have recieved from the general membership.
Given these circumstances, in my opinion, none of the remaining committee are vocally acting in the long term interest of the MOC, and I am wondering what they have to hide. As a body they are rapidy losing credibility as individuals that we must trust to take the club forwards.
Comment