Roadster

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Steve Himsworth
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    I agree with you its not a panel I would ever ​have left out when building a chassis!!
    Originally posted by lil_red_roadster View Post
    It was on eBay a while back...looks even better now.
    But I bet the price has gone up judging by the company it is keeping in the showroom..!
    My only reservation about the doors is wondering how much (if any) the now missing filler piece contributes to structural integrity.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sportster-Green
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    still running on morris V5c...even it seems to say "marina special" its , under the actual laws, not correctly registered.

    could be updated with the DVLA if enough prove, could also end with an IVA.

    • Vehicle make MORRIS
    • Date of first registration 15 September 1978
    • Year of manufacture 1978
    • Cylinder capacity (cc) 1593cc
    • CO₂Emissions Not available
    • Fuel type PETROL
    • Vehicle status Not taxed
    • Vehicle colour GREY
    • Vehicle type approval Not available
    • Wheelplan 2 AXLE RIGID BODY

    Leave a comment:


  • David
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    Is it for sale again? I though the advert Adrian found was an old one.

    Leave a comment:


  • listerjp2
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    Every one to their own, I thinks it looks ok.

    4604227.jpg

    Adrian

    Leave a comment:


  • stevejgreen
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    Originally posted by Franklin, Leicester View Post
    Where is this car for sale? Wouldn't buy it - just snooping. I like the steering wheel angle, I guess it isn't Marina based. I am thinking about the cycle wing option, my idea is to modify some rear wings by chopping and filling the rear light clusters and extending the flare-out at the back. Also I would cut and shape the front at "2 o'clock".
    It is Marina Based. Not the prettiest of suspensions when exposed, from whatever angle, as it always looks fragile to me, with its tall swivel arrangement.

    Leave a comment:


  • FranklinLeicester
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    Ah, just seen where it is for sale. When I said 2 o'clock, I didn't mean just after lunch, I meant looking at the off-side of the car.

    Leave a comment:


  • FranklinLeicester
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    Where is this car for sale? Wouldn't buy it - just snooping. I like the steering wheel angle, I guess it isn't Marina based. I am thinking about the cycle wing option, my idea is to modify some rear wings by chopping and filling the rear light clusters and extending the flare-out at the back. Also I would cut and shape the front at "2 o'clock".

    Leave a comment:


  • philcoyle
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    Try http://www.autow.com/trailer-parts/trailer-mudguards

    Leave a comment:


  • Alan c
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    Have you looked at wheel arches for trailers

    Leave a comment:


  • john cole77
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    Here is a picture of the underslung exhaust exiting at the rear.

    I have saved pictures of this car because I was inspired like the look of it, and it convinced me go go down the cycle wing route with my car

    I like the Idea of extending the doors to make getting in and out a bit easier but was also concerned with the potential loss of longitudinal strength.

    My current thinking is to replace the front and rear bulkheads and the gearbox tunnel with steel sheet to add rigidity similar to a lotus backbone chassis.

    I haven't found any cycle wings that I like the look of yet that you can buy.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • gprentice
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    I think this is a cracker of a car, not to keen on the checker plate interior.
    I would like to know where the exhaust runs, it is Ford 1600 so good possibility its a Kent and would exit on the nearside but it looks as if it must be run under the car as the view from the front does not show an exhaust
    http://m.carandclassic.co.uk/car/C488409.
    This being the case ground clearance must be an issue.
    Graham

    Leave a comment:


  • lizbillings
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    Post some pictures for us please when back on the road

    Leave a comment:


  • charles44
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    That's encouraging seeing as I am rebuilding mine with cycle wings using steel trailer mudguards which are the best shape I have found....
    Have gone for body mounted front mudguards with their rear flared to cover the wheel when turning, hopefully will have it back on the road by the end of next month.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    Whoever built this, really has an eye for detail and style. It all comes together very well - very stripped away, minimalist, yet with real style.

    I'd like to know where the cycle wings came from - they look so much better than most examples I've seen fitted to a Marlin - Roadster, or Sportster.



    Originally posted by listerjp2 View Post

    Proves they can look very nice with Cycle Wings.


    Adrian

    [ATTACH]6598[/ATTACH]

    Leave a comment:


  • listerjp2
    replied
    Re: Roadster

    Well Spotted

    Originally posted by b.caswell View Post
    No they have been made full drop with the bottom steel panel removed. Like the colour.
    Another couple of picies

    4604231.jpg
    4604233.jpg
    Last edited by listerjp2; 20-06-15, 07:53 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...